Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1FP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1FP  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PT10F
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 91.6
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 130
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 168
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.58 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 43 109 73 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 432
Write 131
Mixed 106
SusWrite 88.4
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 15
68% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 76.7
70% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 100%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 124GB
116GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 13 0.5 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 14.9
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
64GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 22 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 22
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 19.4
27% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
16GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 20 17 16 4.7 1.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 155
Write 52.3
Mixed 60
SusWrite 19.7
79% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1FP Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1FP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback