Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq nx8220 (PY542ET#ABE) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0934
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '19 at 14:58
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz-$49 196 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 29.5 1-Core 9.5 2-Core 12.6 13% 17.2 Pts	4-Core 14.8 8-Core 16 2% 15.4 Pts	64-Core 18.3 1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fujitsu MHV2060AH 60GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00830096 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 14 14 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.95% Terrible	Read 15.1 Write 13 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 19.3 11% 15 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.95% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 2.9 3.4 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 3.2 7% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 2048, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.54% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.2 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 258 16% 258 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.54% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16