Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 23:23
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 125
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 421
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 70.8
59% 71.9 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 66 67 66 60 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 145
Write 91.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 67.5
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 28.5
100% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 101
73% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 73%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 171 170 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 161
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 170
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
687GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 63 65 67 59 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 79.5
Write 85.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 65.5
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
207GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 77.8
Write 75.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 70.6
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 131 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 130
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 27.5
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback