Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 23:17
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 144
58% 97 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 400
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 65.9
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 69
Splatting 65.5
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 80 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48% Average
Read 144
Write 87.5
Mixed 107
SusWrite 82.3
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 27.1
105% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 94
75% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48%
Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
661GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 60
SusWrite 110
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
420GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 132 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 114
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 132
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
859GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 168 167 168 168 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 157
Mixed 106
SusWrite 166
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
373GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 73.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 66.9
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 57%
ICY BOX0 IB-124CL-U3 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 30.2
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 29.2
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 7
1,222% 7.33 MB/s
WD Elements 107C 5TB
499GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 85
Write 86
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 103
118% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback