Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory114.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 17:21
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 625
57% 478 Pts
64-Core 2,566
159% 2,566 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 127
Parallax 137
116% 136 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 114
Splatting 96.7
102% 129 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 819 798 816 864 917 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,046
Write 917
Mixed 812
SusWrite 821
202% 899 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 50
160% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 523
396% 535 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 166%
Great: 207%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 1108 1082 1124 1139 1142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,186
Write 932
Mixed 683
SusWrite 1112
220% 978 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 50.1
171% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 629
490% 676 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 199%
Great: 207%
UCSC-F-H16003 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KNCCP100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 977 974 965 966 975 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 660
Write 979
Mixed 784
SusWrite 972
193% 849 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 54.7
184% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 672
502% 669 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 173%
Great: 179%
UCSC-F-H16003 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KNCCP100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 977 974 966 966 975 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 635
Write 975
Mixed 775
SusWrite 972
191% 839 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 54.7
188% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 681
509% 678 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 173%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 44.6
144% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 123%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback