Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	48.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150509
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '19 at 00:11
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 24 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 137 57% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 599 53% 451 Pts	64-Core 2,242 139% 2,242 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 163 Parallax 162 109% 153 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 159 Splatting 120 107% 131 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 78 77 72 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 378 Write 140 Mixed 229 SusWrite 76.2 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 32.9 114% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 126 132% 222 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 328GB free Firmware: 5B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 399 396 354 355 358 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 428 Write 406 Mixed 339 SusWrite 377 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 32 117% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 131 116% 179 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 118%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 72GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 80 81 82 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 124 Write 120 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 81.4 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 8.3 8.3 7.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 58 55 57 55 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 33.2 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 55.4 34% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 115GB free Firmware: A580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 95 95 94 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 79.7 Write 79.3 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 93.6 48% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 8GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 39 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 39 Write 39.2 Mixed 40 SusWrite 40.5 30% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 57%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 982GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 69 65 68 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 64.5 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 67 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.7 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16