Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 23,686 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 38.5 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 122 41% 74 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 382 38% 311 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 64%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MED1OWX 256GB 637 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1331.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 284 256 249 254 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 329 Write 306 Mixed 319 SusWrite 268 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 39.4 136% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 258 216% 314 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 180%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 12.6 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	13x

SSD
RPJTJ256MED1OWX 256GBUmisBench 136%, 637 samples	5x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $38Bench 179%, 78,255 samples	2x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	4x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 154 samples	2x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C20 2x16GBKingstonBench 96%, 1,875 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16