Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 18:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 127
54% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 322
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 53.9
0% 28.4 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 39
31% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 25 54 37 35 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 274
Write 227
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 51.8
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 24.3
110% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 185
119% 136 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 101%
Wl1500gs A6454G 1.5TB
141GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41% Average
Read 76.7
Write 108
Mixed 51
SusWrite 65.5
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
280GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 115 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 112
56% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback