ADD TO PC
BUILD

Rackable XENCOMPUTEA09

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Rackable XENCOMPUTEA09 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel S5520HC
Memory	23.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 05:29
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 133 56% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 428 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.22 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 95.1 Reflection 122 Parallax 111 78% 109 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 122 Splatting 102 87% 106 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 99 92 90 70 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 166 Write 174 Mixed 170 SusWrite 90.7 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 20.9 62% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 36.6 29% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 143GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 88 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 75.2 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 88.2 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 583GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 101 93 91 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 155 Write 152 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 93.7 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 219% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 109%
Ibm-esxs ST3000NM0043 E 3TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: EC5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 142 Write 41.8 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 42.7 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5x8GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 5 of 12 slots used 40GB DIMM Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback