Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B17
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 15:47
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$253 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Memory 98.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 316 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 638 8-Core 1,259 112% 949 Pts	64-Core 1,151 71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 53.3 42% 55.8 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 52.2 48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 121 53 12 70 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 312 Write 233 Mixed 284 SusWrite 73.2 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 16.7 56% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 69.4 DQ Write 60.6 DQ Mixed 62.5 48% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 568GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 165 166 163 165 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 113 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 164 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0812G4DBHE 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 178GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 78 77 78 76 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.6% Average	Read 79.7 Write 80.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 78.7 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB 6,100 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 46.6 MC Write 46.9 MC Mixed 33.6 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 49.1 SC Mixed 35.1 103% 35.9 GB/s	Latency 44.8 89% 44.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,447x
RTX 3070Nvidia $497Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,044x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	877x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $85Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	867x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	663x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	562x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	627x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	453x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $105Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	426x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $798