QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.2 GB free of 11 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '20 at 09:10
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670 23 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 205 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 387 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8708) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 128 Parallax 136 114% 135 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 129 Splatting 108 109% 137 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 109 123 122 125 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 366 Write 124 Mixed 122 SusWrite 119 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 14 62% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 50.1 69% 129 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 11GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 10GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 128 124 125 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.6% Average	Read 384 Write 128 Mixed 124 SusWrite 126 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 14.1 64% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 23.6 55% 118 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 53%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 182 181 179 182 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 189 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 180 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x11GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	66.3% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.5 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16