| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 15 '20 at 23:17 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
40% 330 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87
|
56.6%
Above average
|
56% 66.9 fps
|
58% 70.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 372 383 244 245 240 MB/s
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
81% 358 MB/s
|
120% 44 MB/s
|
192% 256 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905403-198.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.7%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
58% 68.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,823 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 868x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 439x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 120x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |