Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 09:34
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ETH-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 50.7 2-Core 93.5 50% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 277 27% 220 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.47 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900913 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 196 205 209 219 220 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 198 Write 104 Mixed 115 SusWrite 205 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 7.8 62% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 60.8 70% 124 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 17 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 15.9 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 17.3 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.6 171% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G1D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 18JSF51272AZ-1G1D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $605

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16