Acer Aspire 4810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4810T
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 16:05
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11% Very poor
Memory 19.6
1-Core 11
2-Core 13.1
10% 14.6 Pts
4-Core 14.3
8-Core 14
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 17.7
1% 17.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 022A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.3 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.32 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 45 23 32 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 43.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 42
28% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 323
12% 323 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4810T Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback