Acer Aspire 4810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 4810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4810T
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100413
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 23:45
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 31.5
1-Core 16.9
2-Core 15.3
16% 21.2 Pts
4-Core 18.3
8-Core 17.4
2% 17.8 Pts
64-Core 18.9
1% 18.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 022A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.652.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.32 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 18 14 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 17.2
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 246
16% 246 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4810T Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback