Sony VPCZ13C5E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCZ13C5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 640
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 132
55% 93 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 905A) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9024
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.95 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.26
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 192GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 28 40 38 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 114
Mixed 111
SusWrite 36.1
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.1
522% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback