Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 2850e 118 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Memory 24.7 1-Core 15.1 2-Core 11.1 13% 17 Pts	4-Core 19.8 8-Core 19.2 3% 19.5 Pts	64-Core 2.6 0% 2.6 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0301) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.68 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDT721016SLA 160GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.9 1.5 1.6 2.4 2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Read 1.4 Write 1.4 Mixed 1.4 SusWrite 1.8 1% 1.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 14GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.4 1.9 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Read 1.4 Write 1.1 Mixed 1.4 SusWrite 1.8 1% 1.42 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 400, 400 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	MC Read 0.2 MC Write 0.2 MC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.77 GB/s	Latency 287 14% 287 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16