HP 530 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 530 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D5
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 16:15
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M 520
U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Memory 20
1-Core 7.7
2-Core 9.3
10% 12.3 Pts
4-Core 6.1
8-Core 12.8
1% 9.45 Pts
64-Core 15.3
1% 15.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 78 87 92 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 84.3
Write 75.9
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 86
18% 82 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 8.6
29% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 17.1
16% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 0.3
MC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.3 GB/s
Latency 321
12% 321 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback