Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme6+  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 12:51
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 68
2-Core 132
54% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 9.75
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.91
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 376 379 400 399 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 414
Write 348
Mixed 319
SusWrite 384
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 19.9
98% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 22.5
27% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 100%
Areca ARC-1880-VOL#004 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,504
Write 2,096
Mixed 469
302% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 120
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 12.2
254% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 23
126% 280 MB/s
WDC WD8003FFBX-68B9A 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,169
Write 2,180
Mixed 202
265% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 92.8
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 8
202% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 29.9
141% 316 MB/s
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 47 46 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 48.1
Write 44.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 45.6
31% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 51%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
295GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 94.7
Mixed 61
SusWrite 81.5
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
271GB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 74 52 70 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 59.4
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 73.2
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
8GB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 805
Write 2,222
Mixed 300
804% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 121
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 4.3
7,562% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 13
1,348% 289 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
39GB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,186
Write 2,227
Mixed 351
910% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 115
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 5.4
7,436% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 12.2
1,308% 281 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
15GB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 2,208
Mixed 254
703% 971 MB/s
4K Read 120
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 2.1
7,268% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 9.6
1,318% 286 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 OCZ3G1333LV2G CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme6+ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+ - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback