EVGA NF66

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA NF66  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 06:27
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 45.05 GHz, turbo 44.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 82.2
46% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 84.5
11% 84.7 Pts
64-Core 84.9
5% 84.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3482) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 1.91
5% 5.42 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 4
Splatting 6
5% 6.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia JBOD 223.57G 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 92 93 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 86.5
Write 72.3
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 91.7
18% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 10.2
39% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 10
8% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.6
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback