HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory11 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 136
54% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2.06
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 121 124 92 99 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.1% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 166
Mixed 113
SusWrite 110
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.1
8% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
0GB free, PID 2038
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 2.9 0.6 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Read 9
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 1.2
4% 3.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback