| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '20 at 08:22 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
75.4%
Very good
|
70% 116 Pts
|
46% 370 Pts
|
27% 433 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.4
|
30%
Poor
|
31% 40.6 fps
|
28% 34.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 414 414 415 414 415 MB/s
|
||||
|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 374 365 387 384 386 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
37% 161 MB/s
|
12% 4.8 MB/s
|
9% 13.7 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
|
3.75%
Terrible
|
7% 5.8 MB/s
|
18% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.4%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
69% 58 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 191 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 73x |
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 16x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $369 |