Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 618
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 96.7
62% 83.1 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 64
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
614GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 56 56 56 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 85
Write 79.7
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 54.5
17% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 8.1
27% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 24%
52netbar iShareDisk 215GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 52 52 52 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 17% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback