Asus A68HM-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-E  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 00:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 104
44% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 159
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8642) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 13
Parallax 14.1
12% 14.2 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 17.8
12% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 1.5TB
112GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 49 50 45 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 61.2
Write 48.7
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 46.8
13% 57 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 7.3
25% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
52netbar iShareDisk 215GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 45 49 41 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 57.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 43.3
43% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3.2
735% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 31%
hp v232w 16GB
13GB free, PID 7c40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback