Lenovo ThinkServer RD540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo ThinkServer RD540  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO ThinkServer RD540
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 102
44% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 246
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9240-8i 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 205 218 231 259 266 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
Read 235
Write 150
Mixed 175
SusWrite 229
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 16.9
61% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 112
93% 137 MB/s
LSI MR9240-8i 3TB
513GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.4 6.7 7.8 8.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 8.2
17% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback