Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 08:09
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,176
106% 893 Pts
64-Core 2,168
134% 2,168 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 84.3
Parallax 136
76% 104 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 116
84% 100 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,394
Write 944
Mixed 407
201% 915 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 49.3
219% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 807
658% 934 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
36GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 178 178 188 187 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 455
Write 189
Mixed 225
SusWrite 184
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 16.7
109% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 29.8
47% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
139GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 468 467 468 469 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 467
Mixed 438
SusWrite 467
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 49.6
167% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 298
245% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
678GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 85 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 87.2
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 83.9
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
210GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 68 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 74.5
Write 52.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 66.4
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 61%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 113
151% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
785GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 0.7
92% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 113
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.8% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 24
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback