Today's hottest deals

MSI H270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A72
MotherboardMSI H270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 221
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 679
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
108% 136 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 40 38 34 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
76GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 164 170 177 174 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44% Average
Read 465
Write 188
Mixed 223
SusWrite 164
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 10.4
52% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 72%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
362GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2114 2174 1949 797 792 797 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,444
Write 2,154
Mixed 2135
SusWrite 1,437
459% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 90.5
292% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 1,002
742% 988 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 321%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 204 214 217 216 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 97
Write 83.5
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 206
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 197 198 194 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 91
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 189
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 PC MATE (MS-7A72) Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback