Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '20 at 08:33
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 133 61% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 337 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8354) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.87 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 79 83 86 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 90.8 Write 89.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 82.5 56% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%
Samsung SV0411N 40GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 30GB free Firmware: UA100-08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 32.3 Mixed 23 SusWrite 32.2 23% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 23%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3GB free, PID 307a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 10.3 Mixed 8 SusWrite 10.4 16% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	71x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	119x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16