MSI X58M (MS-7593)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7593
MotherboardMSI X58M (MS-7593)  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '17 at 20:30
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$94
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 134
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 341
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
730GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 96.3
Write 77.1
Mixed 89.8
66% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 83.6
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.24
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 109%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 96.9
141% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.25
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EARX-008FB0 2TB
610GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 82.1
Mixed 68.8
99% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 48GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58M (MS-7593) Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58M (MS-7593)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback