Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '20 at 05:21
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 241 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 600 65% 517 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.2% Excellent	Lighting 95.1 Reflection 104 Parallax 98.2 78% 99.2 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 95.6 Splatting 91.6 88% 111 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 94%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 6.81 6% 7.63 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 13.6 9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1456 1663 1630 1544 1519 1609 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	271% Outstanding	Read 1,613 Write 1,776 Mixed 1,027 SusWrite 1,570 337% 1,496 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 56.7 202% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,176 DQ Write 1,015 DQ Mixed 1,074 811% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 271% Great: 393%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 92GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 327 327 326 327 327 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 416 Write 411 Mixed 397 SusWrite 340 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 22.9 74% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 61.9 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 63.7 47% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 97%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 159GB free Firmware: 0106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 69 70 68 70 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 66.5 Mixed 35 SusWrite 65.9 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 45%
WD WD20 00F9YZ-09N20L0 2TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 138GB free Firmware: 0106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 69 70 68 70 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 76 Write 4 Mixed 30 SusWrite 65.9 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 26 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 25.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,072x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	473x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,453x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	823x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	288x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,767x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16