Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro SYS-5039MC-H12TRF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X11SCE-F
Memory	22.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181214
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176G 227 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 236 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 748 72% 592 Pts	64-Core 986 61% 986 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 836GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 81 82 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 358 Write 88 Mixed 121 SusWrite 81.9 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 17.8 79% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 85.1 DQ Mixed 108 86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 781GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 27 25 32 24 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	2.25% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 15.7 Mixed 20 SusWrite 24.1 4% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 1% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ADF2G72AZ-2G6E1 4x16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 26.5 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 20.7 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16