__________________________________ _______

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System__________________________________ _______  (all builds)
Motherboard__________________________________ __________________________
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 15:58
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 227
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 598
56% 466 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.4% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 11.7
28% 16.9 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
fT8a71MXf42SSa5 1TB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 371 377 380 373 368 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 383
Write 355
Mixed 343
SusWrite 372
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 35.9
112% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 301
240% 335 MB/s
Wea Wea9eZ4Z-f4GGJa7 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 160 159 161 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 186
Write 156
Mixed 104
SusWrite 159
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.4 MB/s
S1n8isk Ultr7 USf 7.c US5 9evida 16GB
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.9 7.7 5.5 5 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 35.3
Write 22
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 7
27% 22 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.5
136% 2.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical _______ Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: __________________________________ _______

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback