bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateMar 12 '20 at 15:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6254
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 910
83% 698 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 130D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.06
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 524
Write 254
Mixed 359
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 13.4
58% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 161
170% 291 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 37.7
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 101%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback