bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6254
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 175
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 352
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 130D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.06
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 212
Mixed 286
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 9.4
43% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 9.3
7% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.9 3.6 3.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Read 2
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 3.4
4% 2.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 23.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.6
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback