Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '20 at 00:46
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 63.5 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 188 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 601 56% 469 Pts	64-Core 1,105 68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FC) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 78.5 49% 65.9 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 50.8 47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 51GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 77 70 57 40 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 402 Write 327 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 73.9 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 5.6 61% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 29.2 80% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 325 320 317 312 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 463 Write 343 Mixed 279 SusWrite 328 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 33.4 114% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 270 219% 312 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 133%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 187 184 184 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 220 Write 177 Mixed 109 SusWrite 183 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.7 13% 4.77 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 1 2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 23%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 168 168 168 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 152 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 168 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 151 153 153 156 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 153 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 92 92 91 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 57 Write 84.2 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 90.4 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.3 194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 22.4 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)