MSI 785GTM-E45 (MS-7549)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7549
MotherboardMSI 785GTM-E45 (MS-7549)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '20 at 17:55
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9600
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Memory 2.88
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 65.6
16% 34.1 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 125
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
PwrHis(1787 2268) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 3.47
4% 5.42 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.67
Splatting 6.65
4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 166 167 77 67 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 153
Write 109
Mixed 104
SusWrite 116
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 12.2
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 17.9
14% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
331GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 76
Write 75
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 78.1
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 99P5471-013.A00LF0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 0h DDR2 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 476
8% 476 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 785GTM-E45 (MS-7549) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 785GTM-E45 (MS-7549)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback