MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 04:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 74.1
42% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 144
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 7.34
8% 8.66 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 66 77 69 62 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 82.9
Mixed 106
SusWrite 69.2
19% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 24.5
85% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 35.6
30% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 99P5471-013.A00LF0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 0h DDR2 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback