Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, System Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, System Card (all builds)
Memory	500.3 GB free of 512 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 15:14
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 2830 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 104 52% 80.6 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 430 38% 323 Pts	64-Core 1,075 67% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 499GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 35 35 35 35 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 1,266 Write 706 Mixed 1,305 SusWrite 39.8 184% 829 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 30.9 112% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 230 172% 229 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 166%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 999GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 865GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 36 35 35 35 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 1,498 Write 1,520 Mixed 1,495 SusWrite 44.5 255% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 31.6 114% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 231 176% 236 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 162%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 239GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 190GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 237 237 237 237 238 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 1,439 Write 1,488 Mixed 1,436 SusWrite 241 258% 1,151 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 32.2 115% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 240 182% 243 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 167%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB 26,501 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 191GB free Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 302 302 302 300 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 771 Write 843 Mixed 818 SusWrite 307 154% 685 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 23.3 75% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 214 156% 204 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ17RG4EBWA-DJ-F 32x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 32 of 32 slots used 512GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.5% Average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback