Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, Processor Card (all builds)
Memory	51 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140723
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '20 at 11:09
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4870 138 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 97.4 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 127 61% 96 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 504 45% 379 Pts	64-Core 1511 94% 1511 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.1% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 116 Parallax 99.4 83% 106 fps	MRender 98.9 Gravity 102 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 499GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 383 314 381 382 380 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,580 Write 1854 Mixed 1,699 SusWrite 370 309% 1,376 MB/s	4K Read 69.9 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 65.8 225% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 231 175% 235 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 166%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1.5TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 825GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 114 110 104 105 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1530 Write 1,991 Mixed 1745 SusWrite 110 302% 1,344 MB/s	4K Read 74.6 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 66.9 232% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 218 167% 225 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 158%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 243GB free Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 476 466 481 480 487 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 921 Write 473 Mixed 922 SusWrite 590 163% 726 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 58.2 181% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 565 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 500 362% 474 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 291%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 12GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 5.7 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 18.9 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 6.9 24% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 135% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 23%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 485GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 30.7 47% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3-62MA104SQV-999 D3-62MA104SQV-999 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1066, 1066, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 48.6 82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback