| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba SATELLITE_C50-A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel PT10F |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140422 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 28 '20 at 17:11 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 1005M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
|
39.5%
Below average
|
42% 65.2 Pts
|
10% 79.5 Pts
|
4% 59.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
0.37%
Terrible
|
0% 0.98 fps
|
1% 1.39 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 66 62 82 58 59 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
46% 63.7 MB/s
|
90% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Orbit 8GB
4GB free, PID 557c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.1 MB/s
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
2% 1.5 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown LN-SD304133309SA7L 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
27.6%
Poor
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical SATELLITE_C50-A Builds (Compare 14 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba SATELLITE_C50-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 7x |
| Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 9x |
| HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |