MSI Z270I GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A66)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A66
MotherboardMSI Z270I GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A66)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170814
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 7.07
1-Core 122
2-Core 226
56% 118 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 480
64% 477 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 134
Parallax 115
103% 125 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 124
Splatting 104
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 280 279 279 274 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,853
Write 1,429
Mixed 553
SusWrite 312
229% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 52.9
222% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 1219
DQ Mixed 793
692% 1,021 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
226GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 319 320 320 315 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 396
SusWrite 329
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 63.5
220% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
557GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 434 459 473 418 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 152
Mixed 450
SusWrite 428
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 61.9
210% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
902GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 104
Write 77.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 129
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 113%
DELL RD1000 500GB
197GB free, PID 1122
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 88.8
99% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 432
9% 432 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270I GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A66) Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270I GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A66) - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback