Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 16:03
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 121
54% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 344
31% 260 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.8
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 108 64 58 58 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 473
Write 392
Mixed 396
SusWrite 110
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 25.4
103% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 48.7
59% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 122 129 136 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 39.8
Write 110
Mixed 40
SusWrite 121
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 134GB
91GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 35 34 35 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.5% Above average
Read 148
Write 101
Mixed 85
SusWrite 35.3
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
413GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 34 34 36 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 157
Write 108
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 35.2
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
201% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 108%
Lexar JumpDrive 16GB
6GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 136
Write 22.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 22.7
52% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback