Today's hottest deals

Biostar TZ77B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TZ77B  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 06:10
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 160
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 307
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
Nvidia(10DE 0577) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.81
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.63
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 3.62
7% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 7.63
Splatting 6.22
6% 7.36 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 129 132 131 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 167
Write 128
Mixed 136
SusWrite 133
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 9
48% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 18
22% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 39 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 31.7
Write 33
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 38.3
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.3
121% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 59GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 36
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.7
23% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 33%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 44
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 33.1
27% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 14
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ77B Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback