PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-IB (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190610 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Apr 11 '20 at 06:35 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 84% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
NFS011SA328-6007000 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0626A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 40 38 35 58 35 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
856GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 198 195 196 198 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown NMUD480E82-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 330x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 290x |
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 254x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 276x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 249x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 178x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $243 |