Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Solo U3500 486 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 54.5 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 13.2 24% 28.7 Pts	4-Core 17.6 8-Core 17.6 2% 17.6 Pts	64-Core 17.9 1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 029B) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.29 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB 3,895 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 117 172 171 181 186 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40% Below average	Read 213 Write 185 Mixed 191 SusWrite 165 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 16.6 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 47.4 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 37.5 29% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 2x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Solo U3500IntelBench 28%, 486 samples	1x
U7300IntelBench 30%, 1,665 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
EBE21UE8AFSA-8G-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 13%, 72 samples	1x
M4 70T5663QZ3-CE6 M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 4GBSamsungBench 13%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $40