Acer AOD255E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOD255E  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE02_PT_E
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 13 '15 at 07:18
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 5
2-Core 10.1
3% 7.55 Pts
4-Core 11.4
8-Core 8.4
1% 9.9 Pts
64-Core 13
1% 13 Pts
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2565GSX 250GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 51.5
Mixed 49.7
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.18
40% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 653c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.88% Terrible
Read 11
Write 3.98
Mixed 5.63
8% 6.87 MB/s
4K Read 1.54
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
7% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback