Today's hottest deals

MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 00:42
Run Duration618 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 784
82% 660 Pts
64-Core 799
50% 799 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 126
Reflection 136
Parallax 115
102% 125 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 123
Splatting 0.09
52% 73.1 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 234 262 255 231 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 421
Write 330
Mixed 262
SusWrite 240
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 30.5
109% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 226
194% 287 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 103%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$190
104GB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 89 89 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 158
Write 167
Mixed 84
SusWrite 88.3
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 100%
WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB
104GB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 87 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 159
Write 158
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 88.4
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 99%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$190
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 172 178 173 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 166
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 173
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
93GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 82 86 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$55
110GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 158
Write 158
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 73.5
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 100%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$55
111GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66% Good
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 76.6
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 100%
WDC WD20PURX-64P 2TB
559GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 86.3
Write 91.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 94.6
112% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
233GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 47 51 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 141
Write 145
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 52.2
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 93 102 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 156
Write 155
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 104
161% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK04 3TB
0GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 72.3
154% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 63%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB
50GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 47 51 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 141
Write 143
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 52.4
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGP6.AUC0B 017A 78.CAGP6.C7Z0B 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.7
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 17,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback