Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C02
Motherboard	MSI B450 Tomahawk (all builds)
Memory	19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220725
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '23 at 02:09
Run Duration	605 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 206 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 618 59% 490 Pts	64-Core 751 46% 751 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.1 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.1% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 87.1 45% 66.9 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 43.9 44% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 101 98 104 107 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 91.9 Write 111 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 91 20% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 0.7 7% 3.87 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 4.5 DQ Mixed 0.4 1% 2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 18%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 69 76 63 48 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.4% Very poor	Read 205 Write 189 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 58.9 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 0.5 24% 7.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 0.8 2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 69 76 63 48 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.7% Very poor	Read 196 Write 183 Mixed 129 SusWrite 58.9 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.9 26% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 13.1 DQ Mixed 1.4 3% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 20%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 69 76 63 48 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	Read 209 Write 208 Mixed 115 SusWrite 58.8 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1 26% 7.53 MB/s	DQ Read 3 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 0.2 2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 19%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 213 216 217 219 216 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	Read 217 Write 179 Mixed 130 SusWrite 215 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 0.6 27% 8.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 1 2% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 29%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 6,787 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: PT0D SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 73 47 58 83 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 107 Write 92.6 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 66 52% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 177 188 185 192 186 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 143 Write 151 Mixed 72 SusWrite 185 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 106%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 16.5TB free, PID 4d10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 52 Write 23.2 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 17.8 35% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%
H/W DISK 1 4TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.8 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 115 Write 119 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 0.9 97% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 61%
H/W DISK 2 4TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 54 54 55 55 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 81.7 Write 99.3 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 55.9 105% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 59%
H/W DISK 4 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 936GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 56 56 55 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 56.9 105% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 57%
H/W DISK 3 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 244GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.3 2.6 1.2 1 1.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 97.7 Write 106 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 1.9 82% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 44%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.5 2.9 1.4 1.3 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 104 Write 130 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 2.9 101% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 62%
JMicron Generic DISK04 3TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 758GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.9 1.2 0.7 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 83.9 Write 107 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 1 80% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 63%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 559GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 1 0.7 0.6 1.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 92.9 Write 100 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 0.9 74% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 56 56 56 56 57 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 122 Write 147 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 58.8 133% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 55 55 56 55 56 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 118 Write 134 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 57.4 126% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 620GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.8 3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 50.3 Write 34.7 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 2.9 36% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 63% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 373GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 36 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 20.8 39% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 46%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 285GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 52.6 Write 32.1 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 0.1 33% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 189GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 56 55 56 56 57 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.8% Below average	Read 102 Write 115 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 57.5 113% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 3 45 56 41 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 65.8 Write 81.4 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 36 77% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 107% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 53%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 81GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 55 20 1.4 11 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.1% Very poor	Read 65.6 Write 75.6 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 25 70% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-2666 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K CL16-18-18 D4-2666 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.6% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 25 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 23 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,811x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,125x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $150Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	903x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	574x
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	495x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	356x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	448x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	309x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $50Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	243x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	682x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	433x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	253x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $510

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $278	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370