Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 36.2
33% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 283
30% 237 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
Asus(1043 8454) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 0.16
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 67 65 73 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17% Very poor
Read 150
Write 112
Mixed 132
SusWrite 70.7
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 11.5
14% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback