Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 23:12
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 103
52% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 282
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
Asus(1043 8454) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 345 341 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
465GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 72 77 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76.8
Write 73
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 74.8
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 32 13 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 99.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 25.2
58% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.9
150% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback